“Fraud,
Forgery and Financial Irregularities in Odisha state Cooperative Bank,
Bhubaneswar”
-An Extract
from  Statutory  Inspection 
Report submitted by NABARD- 
(Exposed   under RTI on 27.4.19 from the PIO, office of
Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Odisha) 
1.      Introduction
OSCB scam  is not 
new  for the  people as well as  RTI Activists 
of Odisha  who are  spearheading 
campaign  for effective  implementation of RTI  and 
to  fight out  corruption in the state. Earlier,  huge 
corruption and irregularities  in
Odisha State  Cooperative Bank ,
Bhubaneswar  has been exposed under RTI
several times  and put in public domain
for knowledge  of the public  at large. The expose of corruption and
misappropriation of fund  started with
revelation of statutory audit Report  of
Odisha State  Cooperative Bank
presented  by Auditor General,
Cooperative Societies, Odisha on 30.9.2011. Armed with  this 
Report  and  information obtained  under RTI , many RTI Activists  like Sri Ashok Nanda, Sudhir Mohanty,
Biswajit Mohanty have  filed   series 
of complaints  starting from to
Chief Minister  to State  Vigilance. But astonishingly, no inquiry  has been 
conducted  since 5 years. Rather
it  has been suppressed  and 
corrupt  officers  being  
awarded with  promotion time and
again  to suppress scams. ( For details ,
visit  link https://odishasoochana.blogspot.com/2018/08/inquiry-into-oscb-scam-worth-rs500.html.)
Recently, NABARD, Regional
Office, Bhubaneswar  has presented its
statutory inspection report of the Odisha State Cooperative Bank Ltd. to   State 
Government  which was  conducted from 14th February to 6th
 March,19 with reference to its  financial position  as on 31st March 2018 under
Section 35(6) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ( As Applicable  to Cooperative Societies).  All the 
issues  pointed out  by NABARD 
in their Inspection Report  has
justified  earlier  allegation of RTI Activists  and  complaints  filed 
several times  in this  regard. 
Fraud and
Forgery in Award  of Contract for
computerization to VSoft Company 
Pursuant to a number  of complaints 
received on computerization relating to CBS ( Core Banking Solution) in
OSCB, DCCBs  and PACS ( Primary
Agriculture Cooperative Societies) , 
NABARD  had  conducted inspection about it. It was as
follows. 
The Tender  process 
started  with RFP in September
2010.  The technical bids were  collected 
on 14 January 2011. In terms of the Special Committee Proceedings  ( 10 February 2011), Technical  and Commercial bids were  given weightage  and approved 
after deliberations  at 80:20 ( 80
% for Technical and 20% for commercial), which was considered  to be quite robust  as against industry standard at 70:30.  To ensure 
quality CBS. It  was
suggested  to refer the decision  to consultants. A CBS  software (
Core Banking Solution Software)   demo  was organized 
on 8 July 2011 with participation 
from 14 selected  officials  of the Bank. VSoft  company along with two others  had failed 
to demonstrate  as per tender  documents and there  were very serious shortcomings  raising queries / questions  on their CBS modules.  Only TCS 
and Polaris demonstrated 
satisfactorily  as per
specifications  in their  tender 
documents. Without express
reasons, the  views  of the 
committee  was  overlooked 
and VSoft , on the other hand , were 
handed  the committee’s’
shortcomings  chart in respect  of the 
company for improvement  instead
of the bank rejecting  the tender
outright on technical grounds as per Bid evaluation Criteria( at B6 of
RFP). Meanwhile , the commercial bids were opened  on 30 August 2011. The Evaluation of weighted techno-commercial score was changed from
80:20 to 30:70 ( 30% Technical, 70% Commercial) resulting in VSoft becoming L1.
There was  no pre-announcement of the
revised techno-commercial matrix. The drastic modification giving primacy to
price  and relegating  the technical 
to secondary status in evaluation parameters  had no basis and the consultants’ detailed
opinion / views  on the subject were out
of the record except  a cursory
statement  in the proceedings  of the special committee  dated 30. August 2011.  As per 
technical evaluation conducted by Technical Committee on 21.7.2011,
VSoft, Polaris  and TCS were awarded 146,
150 and 175 out of 200 points respectively. On the aspect of technical presentation
marks awarded  were  15,16 and 18 respectively, though as per the
presentation minutes while TCS  and
Polaris  came out satisfactorily , VSoft
failed  to convince  the committee as the software  was not as per  the tender documents. However, for completeness
of overall solution marks awarded  were
33, 37 and 42 respectively in the matrix. There was apparently inconsistency between  the 
Committee’s assessment  and
the  proceedings  of the 8th July 2011  demo. At 14-member CBS Committee  which treated 
the software  of TCS  and Polaris 
as “ satisfactory”. There was no convincing effort in the Technical
Committee proceedings  to justify  the 
counter view. The marks awarded 
to VSoft is , therefore a kind of window dressing. 
A  group of 10 members  of the Management  Committee (MC)   had submitted dissenting note  with respect to  MC 
RESOLUTION  ON MEETING DATED
25.1.2012  bringing to fore a series of
issues  on CBS implementation. But  the bank had never examined or considered  for redressal of their  complaints , although  the issues 
pointed out  in their dissenting
note  were  quite serious. Even  TCS and Polaris  had 
also complained  vide letters  dated 13 September 2011 and 30 November
2011  respectively  against irregularities  in award of contract. Allegations were  serious but no action  had been taken  on the complaints  in question. 
Questionable Advance  Payments 
to VSoft Company- The VSoft was  provided 
advances  of money amounting to Rs. 1,00,00,000 on 2 July 2014  and Rs. 19,85,000
for VSAT and Rs. 13,44,000 to Trend Micro 
on unknown dates  ( during 2013-14
)  as per the records  of payment available  with DIT. The advances  had no other details  and no one in the  bank 
had any knowledge  as to
their  final settlement. On different
dates between  the period  7 April 2018 to August 2018, the bank had
paid advances  of  Rs. 8,69,43,913 to VSoft  as advance  over and above  CBS contract amount  and outside the agreement. The details of
payments  and purpose   is  
not available  with the  vouchures and DIT  is 
also not aware  of the most of the
purpose  of payments. 
Pradip Pradhan
M-9937843482
Date- 30.6.19 
 
FRESH USA UK CANADA FULLZ SPAMMED & VERIFIED
ReplyDelete SSN DOB ADDRESS PROS
 SSN DOB DL ADDRESS EMPLOYEMENT DETAIL & BANK INFO LEADS
 SSN DOB ADDRESS MMN
 EMAIL & PHONE LEADS
 SSN DOB DL with Issue & Expiry Dates
 High Credit Scores Pros
 ID Scan Front Back with Selfie & SSN
 Business EIN Company FullZ
 Young & Old Age Fullz (2002 above & 1960 below)
 CC Fullz with CVV & Billing Address with SSN
 Dumps With Pins Track 101 & 202
 KYC PROS FOR Uber Eats or Doordash Accounts
 Tax Return Filling Fullz with W-2 Form
 SBA-PUA-UI-Loan Filling Fullz
 Passport Photos ONLY USA
 Cars Database
 Email|Phone Numbers|Employement|Banking Leads
 EIN Look-Up|SSN Look up Service
TOOLS:
 Spamming Tools & tutorials
 Web-mailers -Bulk Email Sender
 Scampage tools and tutorials
 Carding Tools & Tutorials
Payment Method
* USDT * ETH * BTC* PAYPAL
#FULLZ #SINFULLZ#REALDLSCAN #YoungAgeFullz #Fullzseller #CANADAFULLZ #FULLZCANADA #SellerSINDOB #ShopSINDOB#BusinessFullzCanada #CanadaPros #CanadaLeads#HighCSPRos #HighCreditFullz #Fullzseller #UKFULLZ #FULLZUK
"Let's explore opportunities for a mutually beneficial, long-term partnership.
Contact us Telegram: @Albertz101
Gmail: albertartemis6 at g mail dot com