NGOs- funded  for Peoples’ Bio-diversity Registers in
Odisha and  Dillydallying by OBB 
Dear friends 
RTI Application was
submitted  to the PIO, office of Odisha Biodiversity Board (OBB)  under Department of  Forest and Environment, Govt. of Odisha  seeking 
some iformation about  preparation
of Bio-diversity Registers in Odisha. On 21.4.17, the PIO has provided  the following 
information.  The PIO  has tried 
to   cover up  many issues 
by providing  misleading  information 
which will be   challenged  through appeal procedure under RTI Act.  It  
has been outlined below. 
A.               
 Provide
name of the organisations which have been sanctioned funds for preparation of
people’s Biodiversity Registers  (PBR) by
State Bio-diversity Board (year-wise)
| 
Year | 
Name of NGO | 
Total fund sanctioned  | 
Total amount spent | 
| 
2013-17 | 
M/s Swaminathan Research Foundation ( MSSRF), Jeypore | 
3,78,000 | 
3,78,000 | 
| 
2015-17 | 
Grama Swaraj, Baripada | 
4,95,000 | 
4,95,000 | 
| 
2015-17 | 
NIRMAN, BBSR | 
3,60,000 | 
3,60,000 | 
| 
2015-17 | 
SAPNA, BBSR | 
1,70,000 | 
1,70,000 | 
| 
2016-17 | 
PAHAD, Phulbai | 
1,44,000 | 
1,44,000 | 
| 
2016-17 | 
APOWA, Kendrapara | 
90,000 | 
90,000 | 
| 
2016-17 | 
SEWAK, Sundargarh | 
54,000 | 
54,000 | 
| 
2016-17 | 
CARD, Ganjam | 
54.000 | 
54,000 | 
| 
2016-17 | 
CSRD, Cuttack | 
11,70,000 | 
11,70,000 | 
| 
2017 | 
LIPICA, Gajapati | 
18,000 | 
18,000 | 
|  | 
Total | 
36,05,375 | 
36,05,375 | 
B.                
Provide
name of the NGOs who have not  yet
completed the project sanctioned to them 
and reason thereof.
Response of PIO
The
PIO  has responded  that all abovementioned organisations  have not yet completed  PBR. But 
the PIO  has given very confusing
reply  about reasons.  He has mentioned  that 
“ the Draft  PBRs submitted by  abovementioned NGOs are being evaluated  regularly 
by an evaluation committee of OBB  
and necessary  modifications  are being suggested  to them. After incorporating the corrections,
the drafts are again submitted to OBB for evaluation  and this process continues  till the NGOs submit error free drafts. 
Comments:
The PIO should  mention details of  the procedure  for  monitoring or evaluation of the project by
PBB. But he has not clearly mentioned details of the reasons for non-completion
of the project by NGOs.
C.                
Provide
name of  NGOs  which 
have not been   released complete
sanctioned amount till yet and reason thereof including  copy of the file noting.  If the Govt. has sought any query or
compliance or explanation from them, please provide  copy of it.
Response of PIO: 
The PIO has not provided  any information  but cited 
above mentioned  information   which is reproduced  by me “
the Draft  PBRs submitted by  abovementioned NGOs are being evaluated  regularly 
by an evaluation committee of OBB  
and necessary  modifications  are being suggested  to them. After incorporating the corrections,
the drafts are again submitted to OBB for evaluation  and this process continues  till the NGOs submit error free drafts. 
Comments: The PIO has   tried to keep the information secret.  The PIO could have   cited reason for non-release of fund.  The PIO could have provided copy of query or
explanation sought from NGOs.  I think,
this Board has tried its best to harass NGOs citing so-called reasons for non-release
of fund.
D.                
Provide
details of evaluation of the project sanctioned to the NGOs, if any made  by SBB. Name of the evaluators  with their address.  
Response of PIO: 
As
mentioned earlier,  the draft PBRs
submitted  by NGOs are evaluated by  Committee. The details are enclosed  as Annexture-II.
Comments
:  I have wanted  details of evaluation made  by PBB. It means any evaluation conducted or
not. If conducted, the report should be provided.  But the PIO 
has provided  a  copy of office order  about constitution of  5-member evaluation Committee on 12.1.15. It means
Evaluation Committee has not conducted  a
single project since last 2  and half
years.  This is tragedy  how Biodiversity Board is functioning in
Odisha  since last five years of its
functioning.
· NGOs are not properly supported. 
· No monitoring and evaluation of the project  is conducted 
properly. 
· Fund is not released properly. 
· Over all it can be said, Odisha Bio-diversity Board has
failed in all respects. 
 Pradip Pradhan
M-9937843482
Date- 27.4.17 
 
sorry state of Odisha state Bio-diversity Board. It has been engaging the organisations who lick the boots of the officers of Forest department. ANTODAYA has already submitted 29 Peoples' Biodiversity register documents from Junagarh, Bhawanipatna and Thuamul Rampur blocks preparing on its own without getting any fund from OBB, but yet to get any response from the Board. The board officials are adamant in their approach and violate the basic rights of the Garm Panchayat enshrined under the Bio-diversity conservation act and also under Forest Rights Act saying that the Biodiversity board is to advertise the area where Bio-diversity registers to be prepared bi-passing the authority of the Gram Panchayat and Gram Sabha.
ReplyDelete