Wednesday, May 26, 2021

Useless Expenditure of Rs. 5.76 crore towards Government of Odisha advertisement

 

Useless Expenditure of Rs. 5.76  crore  towards  Government of Odisha   advertisement, AG Audit Report

·         Undue favour shown private TV channels violating DAVP guidelines and SC order.

·         No guideline policy  for  issue  of advertisement  was prepared  by State Govt.   for unknown period  with  ulterior motive  to give maximum benefit  to TV channels.

·         Kalinga TV stands  as biggest  beneficiary  of   policy of favouratism   of Nabin Patnaik Govt.

·         This is , no doubt  huge loss  to state exchequer .

·         Price  offered to  TV channels  of Odisha  is  even higher  that that  of  National channels.

 

Prior  to General Election-2020,  Govt. of Odisha  adopted  multi-prone  and multi-faceted   strategy  to use  media  in its  favour  to propagate  so-called  scheme  and programme  of Govt. and highlight image  of Chief Minister  as clean, non-corrupt and best administrator  in the  country   for  mobilizing  people to vote  for  BJD. Huge  amount  of fund  was  mindlessly  sanctioned  to Media   in form of  granting advertisement to keep  them satisfied   and work  for rulling  party. CAG Audit Report has brought it  to the limelight in the state.

 Govt. of Odisha  in Information and Public Relation Department issued  work order to different private TV channels  and commercial TV  channels including Doordarshan Kendra (DDK)  for advertisement of 20 Govt. programme / schemes  during  2016-19 ( Sept. 2018) for  telecast of spot ranged from 30 to 50 seconds as  per schedule  of telecast  in their TV channels and may raise  bill  on negotiated  rates less  discount admissible for payments. Accordingly, the TV channels including DDK  claimed  bills Rs. 7.25, 97,060.00 for  the advertised  development programme. Out of total claimed amount 6,85, 16,238.00 was paid by the department  and Rs.40,80,822.00 is yet  to be  paid to TV channels.

 In this context, AG Audit observed  that  private TV channels ( including news  and General Entertainment  channels)  had claimed bill  of  Rs. 6,98, 08,684.00 towards advertisement as per their negotiated price of telecast cost /spot ( “10 second”). On comparing the list of private TV channels empaneled with DAVP, it was found that DAVP has empanelled the news and GEC as per their time band. For news channel, there are five-time bands and for GEC channel, there are six-time bands. Price for advertisement of each time band   was varying from one other and maximum price   for advertisement of every TV channel was fixed as per their prime time.

 It was  noticed that  I and PR Dept. negotiated  rate  of TV channels  irrespective  of  their time band . Further it was found that  out of total private channels which had advertised  Odisha  Govt. development programme , there were  11 TV channels which were  also  empaneled  with DAVP   to advertise GOI advertisement at rates fixed by DAVP. The  details is as follows.

 Statement  showing comparison of negotiated rate of private TV channels  with DAVP rate

Name  of TV channels

Rate negotiated  by I and PR  per 10 second /spot   for the year  2016-17  & 2017-18

Rate  negotiated  by the DAVP  per  10 seconds ( Prime time)

Audit  remarks  (  rate negotiated  by the  I and PR  is higher than DAVP

Kalinga TV

3200

314

10  times

Prathana  TV channel

2300

625

3.68 times

Tarang TV channel

5200

3304

1.57  times

Zee Kalinga TV channel

3200

367

8.72 times

Kanak News

3000

400

7.5 times

MBC TV

2700

331

8.15 times

O TV

5000

1197

4.17  times

News 7

3200

503

6.36  times

Color Odisha

3000

897

3.34  times

Alankara TV

1800

479

3.76 TIMES

E TV News Odisha

3000

356

8.43 times

 Audit also observed  that  though Department prepared  a Draft policy /guideline  for empanelment  of  media houses  and fixation of rate as per  time band taking into account the weightage  of technical aspects  of each TV channel , but  the  Director, I and PR  has not  taken any steps  for approval of the same. Instead negotiated  the price  on the rate offered by the channels. After  comparing DAVP prime time cost  of the advertisement of private TV channels with negotiated rate of the department , it was  found that Rs. 5,75, 99,309.00 could have been avoided by  the department.

 It is worthwhile  to mention here that India’s  top news channel  and GEC such as “ Aaj  Tak”,  “Z news “, “ India TV” , News18 India , Tarang  etc. were empaneled with DAVP and their  price  per 10 seconds was fixed as per  the  time band which ranged  between Rs. 647.00  to Rs.3304.00 per 10 seconds . It clearly  indicates that that  the rate  offered  by private TV channels were  also three times higher  than the national news  channels   and the  department  without considering  the aforesaid aspects, negotiated rate  and given  undue  financial   advantage   to private TV channels.  

 In the absence of any guideline / policy , the work orders  were  issued  to private TV channels arbitrarily  mentioning in almost  every file , as desired  by higher authority without  making  it clear  “on whose order “  and “ on what basis” . the orders  were  issued to  private  TV channels for  advertisement  of Govt. programme  ignoring ratings of the  channel which defeated  the very purpose of  spending the  public money  judiciously and to ensure  transparency  in selection of  agencies  for Government advertisement.  

 It deserves to mention here that  the  Department  decided to formulate  guideline/policy  on regulation of electronics media and Web Media separately  for delivery  of advertisement message  to the widest  possible messages in a cost  effective manner. A committee was formed in Dec. 15  under  chairmanship  of Director, I and PR Dept.  and meeting was held on 18th April, 2016  in which it was decided to  frame  a policy in line with  guideline/ policy  of  DAVP.  A draft  guideline policy  was prepared  for approval of the  Govt. However it was never approved.

 Pradip Pradhan

M-9937843482

Date- 26.5.21

No comments:

Post a Comment