Govt.  of Odisha maintains utmost secrecy on
Ghangapatna Land Scam, Information Commission directs  Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar  to produce the information within 7 days
Dear friends
In a
significant development, on 14.7.17., Mrs. Sashi Prava Bindhani, State
Information Commissioner directed to Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar to produce all the
information about Ghangapatna land to the Appellant within 7 days.  This direction came out following hearing of
Second Appeal petition                No.  284/15 by the Commission.  Mrs. Bindhani 
has also  given direction  to  the
PIOs, Dept. of Revenue and Disaster Management and Office of Collector,
Khurda  to produce detailed report  about  
details of follow up action taken by them  to ensure information.  The date for next hearing was fixed  on 16.8.17. 
A brief History  of the Case
In August,
2014,   it  was exposed 
by  the local people and media
that  huge acres of tribal was  illegally 
acquired  by  late Kalpataru Das and his MLA Son Pranab
Balabantaray  and Sri K.V.Singhdeo, BJP
MLA in name of her daughter and many powerful people  connected 
with BJD party  in
Ghangapatana  area of Bhubaneswar  under jurisdiction of Tahasildar,
Bhubaneswar.  After this expose , all the
opposition political parties and Civil Society Groups  coming to the streets  organised 
protest   dharana demanding CBI
inquiry  into scam.  It is
popularly  known as Ghangapatna land Scam
in Odisha.   In the midst of protest,
Chief Minister ordered  for  Crime Branch enquiry  and 
after few days  the Govt.
declared  that  70 acres of 
land  of Ghangapatna returned  back to Govt. fold. 
To  verify the authenticity of  information, RTI Application dt. 17.9.14 was
submitted  to the PIO,  Office of Revenue and Disaster Management, Govt.
of Odisha, Bhubaneswar   seeking
information about details of 
Ghangapatana land  returned back
by Govt.  Though 30 days passed, the PIO
did not supply   the information. Then, on 31.1.2.14,  I made first appeal to the First Appellate
Authority  to hear the case and provide the
information. Though 30 days passed, the FAA neither heard the case nor provided
the information.  Then, Second
Appeal  was filed  to Odisha Information  Commission 
seeking  information  and penalty 
against PIO under section 20 (1) of the RTI Act. 
Pradip Pradhan
M-9937843482
Date-15.7.17 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment