Fact-finding Report on Alleged Torture of Charulata Mohapatra  against Subas Mohapatra, Human Rights
Activist, Odisha
1.Background
On 7.8.17, in
an impromptu Press meet organised in Bhubaneswar, capital city of Odisha,  Charulata Mohapatra, claimed to be wife
of  Subas Mohapatra, Human Rights
Activist alleged  that Sri Mohapatra had
married her following vedic rites and rituals on 29th  January, 2003. After 15 days of marriage, he
and his mother started torturing her and demanded more dowries from her
parents. Subas carried her to Chhatisgarh and continuously tortured her   and after 3 months of marriage,  when she was pregnant, Subas sent her  back to her parental house. Since that period,
he is not in touch with her. Though he is blessed with a girl, Subas has never
come to meet his daughter. Charulata also further alleged that without divorce,
Subas married another girl Akriti Das in Raipur.  That marriage also did not last. Akriti had
filed a case in Raipur Mahila police station and Subas was also arrested during
that time. In the meantime, Subas had third marriage and staying in Bhubaneswar
with his wife and two children. Findinging very difficult to sort out the
issues with Subas after long persuasion by her parents, Charulata filed
maintenance case in Puri family court. 
The Court has disposed the case and directed Subas Mohapatra, husband to
pay  Rs. 3,000.00 per month. But Subas
has been ignoring the order of the Family court. When she lodged complaint to
local police station, Subas along with another unidentified person abused her
with slang language  and threatened  to murder her, unless she withdrew the case. 
Having heard
the news about allegation of a lady against Subas Mohapatra,  a known Human Rights Activist, the Activists’
groups got astonished, expressed  their
concern and  wanted to find out fact
which prompted  to form a fact-finding
team  for a thorough investigation into
the whole episode.  
2.The Members of Fact-findIng Team 
A.  
Pradip Pradhan, RTI Activist,
Team Leader 
B.   
Sri Sudhir Mohanty, Advocate,
Odisha High Court 
C.   
Sri Ashok Nanda, Social
Activist  
D.  
Smt. Sanjukta Panigrahi, Woman
Activist 
3. The issues before the Committee 
a.   
To ascertain the fact about
allegation of torture made by Charulata Mohapatra against Subas Mohapatra. 
b.   
Circumstances or compulsion, if
any leading to organise impromptu Press Meet by Charulata Mohapatra in
Bhubaneswar on 7.8.17.  
c.    
Timing and necessity of the
Press Meet in Bhubaneswar and how it was thought of that  this Press Meet would help the  victim to get justice. 
d.   
Why FIR against Subas Mohapatra
was filed in Kanas Police station on 
7.8.17 at 9.50 PM after press meet when the incident occurred on 6.8.17 at
7 PM.  
e.   
Involvement and interest of
Mamata Samantaray of State Progressive Women Forum in this case. 
f.    
Exploring possibility of
intervention of, if any required by Activist Group and taking stand on it. 
4. Materials collected and relied  by the Team 
a.   
Copy of Press Release
circulated in Press Meet organised by Mrs. Charulata Mohapatra on 7.8.17.
b.   
Copy of Judgement of  District Judge court on Divorce petition of
Subas Mohapatra, 
c.    
Copy of Judgement of Family
Court on Petition of Maintenance filed by Charulata Mohapatra.
d.   
Copy of FIR filed by Akriti
Das, second wife  of  Subas Mohapatra wh ich was produced  by Mamata Samantara  and Basant Mohapatra,  father of Charulata Mohapatra. 
e.   
Proof Of  AirTicket 
that Subas Mohapatra was in New Delhi 
5.
Persons interviewed 
a.   
Basant Mohapatra, Father of
Charulata Mohapatra, victim 
b.   
Laxmipriya Mohapatra, Mother of
Charulata Mohapatra
c.    
Mamata Samantaray, Chairperson,
State Progressive Women’s Forum , Bhubaneswar 
who helped  Charulata to organise
press meet in Bhubaneswar 
d.   
Subas Mohapatra, Human Rights
Activist  against whom allegation has
been made.
e.   
 Some villagers accompanied the Team during
their visit  to residence of Mrs Charulata
Mohapatra. 
6.
About Subas Mohapatara
As we know,  Subas Mohapatra  is a leading Human Rights Activist working on
human rights issues  since few years. He
belongs to Kalamati, a village under Gadishagada police station of Kanas block
of Puri district.  Presently, he is
working as Convener, National Campaign for Ending Corporate Abuse.  He has filed a lot of cases  of human rights violation in National Human
Rights Commission, State Human Rights Commission  and UN Bodies.  Recently Sri Mohapatra has come to
limelight  and drawn attention of  public 
due  to  his filing 
of Case
no. 92/2016/EZ in National Green Tribunal, Kolkata against Kalinga
Institute of Industrial Technology  (
KIIT) and Kalinga Institute of Social Science (KISS), and its founder Achyut
Samant for illegally grabbing precious forest land  in Bhubaneswar 
and obtained order of NGT  on 21st
March 2017  to State Govt.
to  demarcate  and acquire the land and undertake  fencing around the land.  It deserves to be mentioned here that As per
CAG Report, more than 100 acres of land has been allotted  to KIIT by Dept. of General Administration
and IDCO, Bhubaneswar. Leasing out of 82 acres of land is illegal and acquired
by Achyut Samant through fraudulent means. Besides that,  as per RTI information, Sri Samant has also
acquired  around 30 acres of forest
land  illegally  without any permission  from Dept. of 
Forest and Environment ,  Revenue
and Disaster Management Dept. of Govt. of Odisha  and Ministry 
of Environment and Forest, Govt. of India.  Secondly, Sri Mohapatra has also filed another
case Writ
Petition Case No. 12392/2016 and Misc. case 13575/2017 in Odisha
High Court against Sri Nabin Patnaik, Chief Minister and President, Biju Janata
Dal for using Hawala money   during
election.  Hearing the case, the High
Court has already issued notice to Election Commission of India to enquire into
the allegation against Sri Nabin Patnaik. 
BJD team quite disturbed over the allegation and case filed by Subas
Mohapatra in High Court.  Since day 1
of  filling of case, both Nabin Patnaik,   Chief
Minister   and Achyut Samant,  founder, Kalinga Institute of Industrial
Technology      (KIIT)   and their coterie  are trying hard to conspire and
demoralise  Subas Mohapatra  by booking  
 him  on false case or take any extreme  step against him  which 
was reflected  in a national TV
Live discussion  in which Pinaki Mishra,
MP openly  threatened  him of dire consequence. 
7. Visit of Fact-finding Team 
In this
backdrop, on 14.8.17, the 4-member Fact-finding Team visited Kanas block
headquarter to meet Charulata Mohapatra, wife of Subas Mohapatra. After
reaching in their home, the Team briefed the parents of Charulata  Mohapatra 
about purpose of their visit  and
wanted to meet her. Intitally, we were told that  Charulata would meet us  and later on 
the parents said that she had gone to Bhubaneswar. The Team could not
get opportunity to meet Charulata. However, her parents responded all the queries
of the Team and shared details of information about incident of disturbance, conflict,
suffering of her daughter, pain and agony experienced by them since 13
years  etc.  The gist of discussion with parents of
Charulata Sri Basant Moapatra, father and Laxmipriya Nayak, Mother  is as follows. 
“ This was
arranged marriage and solemnised  on 29th  January, 2003.  Prior to marriage,  the parents were appraised  that 
their groom  is highly educated
and working  in NGO in Chhatisgarh.  Subas 
had demanded  dowry of Rs. 1 lakh.
 Basant Mohapatra had given  Rs. 70,000.00 and assured him to give rest
amount   Rs. 30,000.00 after arrangement.
After 15 days of marriage, Subas started torturing her wife Charulata to get
rest of dowry money.  Smt.  Charulata returned back to her home. However,
Basant Mohapatra, father-in-law   gave
rest amount by selling landed property and sent her daughter to father-in-law’s
house. After few days, Subas Mohapatra, son-in-law started again torturing her.
Finally she returned back to home. At that time, she was pregnant. Since
then,  Charularata  had not 
gone to her in-law’s house.  However,
the parents of Charulata and their family members have taken several attempts
to resolve the issue and pursued Subas for amicable settlements, but in vain.”   At
last,  after eight years,  Charulata filed  an FIR 
of physical  torture, harassment
and dowry torture  against Subas
Mohapatra in  Gadishagada police station
under Kanas Block  in 2011 ( Case
No.-15/2011 dated 14.2.2011. The case was registered under section 494,109,
406, 498 of IPC. Subas was arrested by police and forwarded to jail.  
The team
members were presented few documents along with Court order.  While reviewing the Court order, the Team
members found that that Subas Mohapatra had filed a divorce petition case no.
418/2003 on 4.6.2003 in the court of S.D.J.M., Puri  which was rejected on 10.4.2007.  Then Subas filed Appeal petition case No. RAF
54/2007 which was rejected by District Court   on 25.10.2013.  So the Court has not accepted the divorce
petition of Subas Mohapatra. Charulata still enjoys the status of wife of Subas
Mohapatra.  On the other hand, Charulata
has filed a Maintenance case No. CRP-29/2011 on 14.2.2011. The Family Court,
while disposing the case on 15.9.2011, directed   Subas Mohapatra to pay maintenance at the
rate of Rs. 3,000.00 per month    to
Charulata Mohapatra and his daughter from the date of filling of the petition
i.e., 14.2.2011.  The fact is  Smt. Charulata as   the legal wife of  Sri Subas Mohapatra is  undisputed 
in the eye of law today. 
From another
document, it was also observed that Subas had married another girl named Akriti
Das, D/O- Nilakantha Das of Raipur.  That
marriage also could not last.  When Akriti
came to know that Subas  was  having wife and a daughter, she got
enraged  and filed FIR in Raipur Mahila
Police station on 12.12.2008. The case was registered as case No. 41/2008 under
section 498(1) and 506 of IPC. There was another case filed in Rajendra Nagar
police station in 2009.  Arrest warrant
was also issued against Subas during that time. 
Though the Team members tried to know the status of the case, the family
could not provide any documents. However, while ending the discussion with the
parents of Charulata Mohapatra, the Team members assured them to provide
support, in case anything required in order to give her justice.  
The Team were
also appraised about FIR lodged against Subas Mohapatra   in Kanas Police station. The Team members
visited Kanas Police station at around 3.30 pm and enquired about the
case.  The Assistant Sub-Inspector said
that an FIR   had been filed  by Charulata Mohapatra on 7.8.17 at 9.50
PM.  The content of the FIR is that On
6.8.17,   While Charulata  was on her wayback to her house  in Kanas market in the evening at 7 PM,
Motor-byke borne Subas Mohapatra along with an unidentified youth  obstructed and  abused her with slang langage and
threatened  her to murder at gun point,
unless she withdrew the case.  The police
has registered the case  under section
341,323,294,354,506,494 of IPC and  34 of
Arms Act. The police has started investigation. 
The Team members    hovered
over  if the incidence took place on 6th
August, 2017 at 7 pm, why the FIR  was
not  immediately  filed when 
Kanas police station is just  half
km away  from her house.  Secondly, why Charulata suddenly
organised  Press Meet on 7.8.17. In the
press release, she has mentioned  about
the incidence of threats  given by
Subas  on 6.8.17 at 7 PM and  FIR  is filed  in Gadishagada police station in this regard.
It means  that the place of occurrence of
incidence   is under PS  Gadishagada  which is the police station  of Subas Mohapatra. But as per record
available, FIR was practically  filed in
Kanas Police station on 7.8.17 at 9.50 pm after she returned  to home finishing press meet in Bhubaneswar. 
7. Meeting with Mamata Samantaray, President, SPWF,
Odisha 
On the way
back to Bhubaneswar from Kanas, the Team 
met Mamata Samantaray in her residence 
at 5 PM.   Mamata was appraised  about the purpose of  meeting of the Team members. Mamata  was asked the following few  questions. 
·     
How Mamata came into  contact 
with Charulata Mohapatra, wife of Subas Mohapatra
·     
Timing of the  Press Meet  
which was organised  in Bhubaneswar  to highlight 
a 13 year old case.  
·     
  What benefit  
you and Charulata  were  expecting 
from Press Meet.
·     
How the Press Meet  would help 
Charulata to get justice. 
Mamata said
that  her organisation  is a state-level  organisation having  its membership base  in every block of the state, mostly from
among  SHG leaders.  The women leaders  of 
Kanas block  of Puri district had
appraised  this matter  several times and  sought her support  to give justice to Charulata. That’s why she
had organised   the press meet.  On query about how the Press meet helped her
to get justice, she could not respond properly. Rather she continued to talk
emotionally, describing harassment and problem confronted by Charulata   which was not our  cup of tea. On query about what type of
justice she was expecting from Press Meet when all the court judgements are in
favour of Charulata, Mamata could not respond effectively. Rather she told that
she only created space for Charulata  to
speak to press and was unaware  about
details. 
8. Response 
from Subas Mohapatra, Human Rights Activist and Husband of Charulata
Mohapatra
As Sri Subas  Mohapatra claims  staying in New Delhi,  some 
clarification and  response of
Subas Mohapatra was sought   through
E-mail. The following questions were sought from  Sri Mohapatra.  
a.   
Response about allegation and
charges levelled by Charulata Mohapatra, his wife against him  and reason 
of divorce, non-payment of maintenance 
to her wife. 
b.   
 Authenticity 
about his threats to Charulata Mohapatra on 6.8.17 at Kanas Market 
c.    
Allegation  of second marriage to Akriti  Das  of
Raipur 
d.   
Has he challenged in apex court
the judgement of rejection of Divorce petition by District Court and Family
Court order on maintenance cost.  
Subas
responded to our query letter through e-mail and provided some documents. He
shared copy of FIR filed in Kanas Police station dated 13.8.17 and copy of
online acknowledgement receipt of FIR by Kanas police station. It was found
from content of FIR that Subas Mohapatra had filed FIR in Kanas Police station against
Charulata Mohapatra and others.  A copy
of FIR and acknowledgement receipt of FIR by Kanas Police station is attached.
Subas denied allegation of making physical attack on Charulata Mohapatra  of Kanas/ Gadishagada  and said that 
he was in Delhi on the date of alleged incident.  He has also provided copy of boarding pass
from Delhi to Srinagar on 1.8.17 and  
return   from Srinagar to New
Delhi on 5.8.17 claiming to be on journalistic assignment from Cobra Post.  He has sent family photograph of claiming
that to be of  Akriti Das / Akriti
Shukla. He says that he has challenged district court order at higher level but
 has not sent any supportive document in
this regard. 
Our findings 
A.  
It is fact that Subas Mohapatra
had married Charulata Mohapatra and filed divorce petition in 2003 in the
court. The document revealed that Sri Mohapatra 
has not yet responded  court order
in respect of maintenance as well as divorce. Smt. Charulata has every right to
fight out the case in order to get justice.  She should continue  to fight this case. We are of the view that law
should take its own course to a logical conclusion in this regard. All possible
remedies  may be taken to safeguard the
interest of Smt. Charulata. 
B.   
In the press release
distributed in the press meet, it is mentioned that  Subas  
threatened her  to murder at
gunpoint  to withdraw the case on
6.8.17  at 7 PM  in Kanas Market.  In fact, 
there is no such case pending 
against  Subas Mohapatra  in any court. The judgement of two  courts i.e., District Judge Court and Family
Court, Puri  is in favour of
Charulata.  So  it seems this is a manufactured story   and a ploy 
to  harass  and defame Subas Mohapatra. 
C.   
While addressing press meet
organised on 7.8.17,  Smt. Charulata  had said that 
After threats of attack, she had filed FIR in  Gadishagada police station.  But   FIR  has been filed  in Kanas police station  on 7.8.17 
at 9.50 pm after finishing press meet. 
We are of the view that it is a false 
 and fabricated case to demoralise
and harass Subas Mohapatra.
D.  
The Press Meet is an arranged one
to demoralise Subas Mohapatra  and or
other RTI Activists  those are  fighting 
against corruption in administration and Achyut Samant of KIIT  disclosing illegalities  of powerful people  in the state.
E.   
 When  a
person , irrespective of his or her family problem is fighting against  Sri Nabin Patnaik, all powerful Chief
Minister and  Sri Achyut Samant , a
biggest land grabber , he or she  should
not  be demoralised  by way of filling of false case   and threats of arrest. We are  with Subas 
Mohapatra  in his  fight 
against Nabin Patnaik, Chief Minister, Odisha  and Achyut Samant, a man masterminded  all types of illegalities  in the state. 
F.   
We  are of 
the view that   RTI Activists and
Human Rights Activists  who are facing
similar kind of harassment and  threats
from State power or vested  groups like
Achyut Samant, biggest  land grabber   must be 
provided all supports  and
encouraged  to  carry 
their mission in the greater interest of the state.  Because during Nabin Patnaik regime, the
economy of the state has been disastrous. 
The socio-economic condition of the common people has been devastating.
Odisha still stands as poorest state in the country. When opposition political
parties have failed to discharge their duties, RTI Activists and Human Rights
Activists  have shouldered the
responsibility  to  save the state  from clutches 
of Mining mafia, land mafia 
and  corrupt politicians and
bureaucrats. The people of Odisha must stand behind them. 
Pradip Pradhan                                                                                                                 Ashok
Nanda
RTI Activist                                                                                                                         Social
Activist
M-9937843482                                                                                                                   M-
9437005133                                                  
Sudhir Mohanty                                                                                                               Sanjukta
Panigrahi
Advocate, Odisha High
Court                                                                                     Woman
Activist 
M-9861063290                                                                                                                   M-
9238598756 
Date of  Release of Report: 22.8.17