Tahasildar , Bhubaneswar  does
not care to  appear during hearing of the
case  and simply ignore   order of Odisha Information Commission
Tall claim of Nabin Patnaik
as Transparent Govt. is false and fraud with OIC finding helplessness   and busy in 
issuing notice after notice …….. 
The Case is  non-supply of information about Ghangapatna
Land Scam , biggest land scam  in
Bhubaneswar perpetuated  by
politicians  of BJD and BJP
patronised  by Nabin Patnaik, Chief
Minister of Odisha
Dear friends 
 In August, 2014,   it 
was exposed  by  the local people and media that  huge acres of tribal was  illegally 
acquired  by  late Kalpataru Das and his MLA Son Pranab
Balabantaray  and Sri K.V.Singhdeo, BJP
MLA in name of her daughter and many powerful people  connected 
with BJD party  in
Ghangapatana  area of Bhubaneswar  under jurisdiction of Tahasildar,
Bhubaneswar.  After this expose , all the
opposition political parties and Civil Society Groups  coming to the streets  organised 
protest   dharana demanding CBI
inquiry  into scam.  It is
popularly known as Ghangapatna land Scam in Odisha. It is another type of KIIT
Land Scam in Bhubaneswar.   In the
midst of protest, Chief Minister ordered 
for  Crime Branch enquiry  and 
after few days  the Govt.
declared  that  70 acres of 
land  of Ghangapatna returned  back to Govt. fold. It was highlighted  by all Print and Electronics Media
during  that time. 
  To verify the authenticity of information,
RTI Application
dt. 17.9.14 was submitted to the PIO,  Office of Revenue and Disaster Management,
Govt. of Odisha, Bhubaneswar   seeking
information about details of  Ghangapatana
land  returned back by Govt.  Though 30 days passed, the PIO did not
supply   the information. Then, on 31.1.2.14,  I made first appeal to the First Appellate
Authority  to hear the case and provide
the information. Though 30 days passed, the FAA neither heard the case nor
provided the information.  Then, Second
Appeal dated
1.2.15 was filed to Odisha Information Commission seeking
information and penalty against PIO under section 20 (1) of the RTI Act. 
After two and half years, on 14.7.17., Mrs. Sashi Prava
Bindhani, State Information Commissioner started
hearing the  Second Appeal petition  Case No. 
284/15.  The PIO, office of
Collector, Khurda submitted that though he had noticed thrice to the
Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar to provide the information,  he did not respond.  After hearing it, the Commission  issued 
direction to the PIO, office of Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar to produce all
the information about Ghangapatna land to the Appellant within 7 days and fixed
16.8.17 for second hearing of the case. 
On 16.8.17, during hearing, the PIO, office of
Tahasildar  neither filed  any affidavit nor appeared  the case nor provided any  information.  The order of the Commission was simply thrown
to the dustbin.    However, the Commission  has issued 
notice  again to PIO, office of
Tahasildar to  appear , file  the affidavit 
in the next day of hearing. 
 Pradip Pradhan
M-9937843482
Date- 20.8.17 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment