Tuesday, July 27, 2021

Complaint filed against Chairman, Lokayukta, Odisha before Governor, Odisha

 

Complaint under Section 37 (4)(c) of Odisha Lokayukta Act 2014

 To                                                                                                                                                          Date-  26.7.21

His Excellency Prof. Ganeshi Lal

Hon’ble Governor, Odisha

Raj Bhawan, Bhubaneswar

 

Sub- Seeking action against Chairman Odisha   Lokayukta Justice Ajit  Singh  under Section 37 (4)(c) of Odisha   Lokayukta  Act,  2014

 Ref: Order of Odisha  Lokayukta No. LY- 1027/2020 dated 9.7.21  issued by a Lokayukta Bench comprising Justice Ajit Singh Chairperson and   Sri Debabrata Swain, Member.   

 Esteemed Sir,

 I,  Sri Sarbeswar Behura , RTI Activist  and anti-corruption crusader , faced bomb attack due to my fight against corruption of powerful people  would like to draw attention of your august office  the following complaint and take action deemed proper by way of exercising  your power under Section 37( (4) (c ) of the said Act-

 1.    In order to apprise your august office on the rationale of the above complaint I    beg  to narrate a summary of the facts and circumstances that made us to file it before your esteemed authority and I fervently hope that your august office shall pass an appropriate order in the matter to meet the ends of justice and probity.

 2.    On 28th night of August, 20, Electronics media  aired  breaking news  that   the Irrigation Embankment  Road  from NH-5  ( Gokarneswar )  to Budhalingam Majhipada Road ( length-20 kms)  along embankment  of Kelua river  under Jajpur district  got destroyed  at Niraghat by  explosion of dynamites  and  impression  was  given  that  due  to  heavy flow  of flood  water ,  the  embankment  got   cracked  and  damaged and  damaged  4000  hect. of   paddy.  After  few hours , the  statement  of the then District Collector, Jajpur  and  then Chief Secretary came  out  that this  damage  was  man-made and destroyed by miscreants. On 29.8.21, the Deputy Executive Engineer, Jaraka Irrigation Division, Jaraka filed FIR in Dharmashala Police station for inquiry into the incident.

 3.    Alleging of destruction of embankment, a conspiracy to cover up huge irregularities and corruption in construction of the   road, I filed complaint dt. 7.9.20 before Lokayukta, Odisha seeking inquiry into destruction of embankment and punish the people responsible for it.

 4.    My allegation was following information obtained under RTI Act. That, this  project  was  sanctioned in 2016  by the  office of  the  Executive Engineer,  R&B, Panikoili Division   with Agreement No. 21 P with an estimated  amount  of Rs. 21.99  crores. Sri Balakrustan Mohanty, Contractor was entrusted to execute the work and complete it  by 30.4.2018. But, the  local MLA Sri Pranab Balabantaray   and  Sri Naren Jena, Junior Engineer close  relation of  MLA     used  local  hooligans  to  create  trouble  for  the  Contractors  for  which  he  could  not  start  the  work.  The work got  delayed  for  two years and  the  project  cost   revised  to  Rs. 24.47 crore. Huge corruption and misappropriation of fund resulted in low quality  of work and weak embankment .

5.    In order  to suppress  low  quality  of  work,   then then Tahasildar, Dharmashala  and then Executive Engineer, R&B, Panikoili Division put  a check post at entry side of embankment in 2020  in order to check movement  of big vehicles apprehending that  it may damage embankment taking plea  that this check post  was put  at  the instruction of  Collector, Jajpur  which was  false , confirmed as per RTI Reply given  by the  office of Collector, Jajpur which stated that no such had been issued to Tahasildar, Dharmashala.

 6.    Taking  cognizance  of  the  complaint ( registered –LY- 1027/20) ,  Lokayukta Bench comprising  Chairman Justice Ajit Singh   and Sri Debabrata Swain, Member issued  notice on  to  Chief Engineer, works, Sri Pranab Balabantaray, MLA, Executive Engineer, R&B, Panikoili  to reply  on above-mentioned  allegation.

 7.    After considering their respective submissions, on 8.1.21,  the Lokayukta  ordered  to state Vigilance  for  inquiry into complaints filed by Sarbeswar Behura.

 8.    On 7.7.21, the  Director  of State Vigilance  submitted  preliminary  report before  Lokayukta, Odisha.

 9.    Considering  the  report, Lokayukta Stated  that  the  allegation of corruption made  in the  complaint  regarding  use of substandard  material  in the  construction  work  of embankment  have been found  to be  false and  closed  the  case on 9.7.21.

 10.   During  hearing  of the case, when I sought  the  inquiry  report  of State Vigilance,  the  Lokayukta bench  denied  to share  the  copy  of the  inquiry  report  on the  ground that  there  is no  such  provision  for  sharing  of the  report  to  complainant  in Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014.

 11.   It  deserves to  mention here  that  during  inquiry  conducted by Vigilance, I had  presented  some  documents  obtained under RTI  from the  office  of Executive Engineer, R&B, Panikioli dt. 28.9.20  - (A)  the office  of Executive Engineer, R&B, Panikoili  had  deducted Rs. 1.52  crore  from the  final  bill  of  Contractor  towards royalty  against  use  of  sand, stone  and Morum . In fact,  this  royalty  should be  deposited  in the  office  of Tahasildar, Dharmashala  at the  time  of lift  of said materials. As  not  a single  material  has been lifted  and used  in the embankment, the   contractor  had  not  deposited  the said  royalty  amount  in the  office of Tahasildar, Dharmashala  and  misappropriated  the said money. (B) As  the  construction work  was  going on  the  revised  estimated  budget  of  Rs. 24.47  crore, the  office  of Executive Engineer , R &B,  sanctioned  F 2  work  worth Rs. 63.12  lakhs (  dividing work  into 12  sanctioning Rs. 3 to 4 lakh for each work)   to Lalita Mohanty of  Puri district , a lady  which is no way related  to this work without any tender. This total amount was misappropriated as there was no such provision for F-2 work when the work was going on.  (C)  this  work  was  primarily  was handed  over to  Batakrustan  Mohanty , contractor  who could not  undertake  the work  and  his  son  Subash Mohanty  obtaining power  of  attorney  started  the  work  and  could not  progress. He engaged another contractor Sangram keshari Jena of Kendrapara  to  finish  the work.   But  the  Vigilance  during  inquiry  did  not  take  into  consideration the   above documents submitted by me.

 12.   When  I raised  these  issues   that  has not been taken  into  consideration by Vigilance, Odisha , Lokayukta  did not  listen  anything and arbitrarily  closed  the case.

 In view of the facts and circumstances narrated above, we are of the view that  Justice  Sri Ajit Singh, Chairperson, Lokayukta has patently failed to discharge his statutory obligations as required of him. We therefore pray before your Excellency Sir to order an action deemed proper against Justice Sri Ajit Singh Chairman Lokayukta, Odisha on the ground of mental infirmity in exercise of the powers vested in Governor Odish under Section 37(4)(c) and simultaneously to pass another Order deemed appropriate, in the capacity of Executive Head of the State under Article 154(1) of Constitution, for institution of an  impartial and comprehensive enquiry covering all the parties mentioned in our Complaint   and exploring all angles thereto, so as to unearth the factors and actors responsible for  destruction of embankment and corruption involved  in it .   

 Yours  sincerely

 Sarbeswar Behura

At-Saroi, Post-Haridaspur

Dist-Jajpur

M- 9437459949

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment