Disastrous situation of office of 
Ombudsman functioning under MGNREGA in Odisha and Physical harassment and mental torture of an Ombudsman by inept bureaucracy in Ganjam district
Ombudsman functioning under MGNREGA in Odisha and Physical harassment and mental torture of an Ombudsman by inept bureaucracy in Ganjam district
On 23.3.15, Sri Sadanand Rao,
retired OAS officer who has been appointed as Ombudsman in Ganjam
district  by the Govt. of Odisha on
28.11.13 to conduct enquiries  into
complaints  and grievances  of the daily wage workers under MGNREGS (Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme) filed a complaint to National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), New Delhi stating that after his appointment as
Ombudsman, no facility of accommodation 
in the DRDA office, vehicle, complaint Box,  administrative
support staff  had been given to
him.  The Ganjam DRDA Authority had not
disbursed the legitimate sitting fees / remuneration of Ombudsman. He has been
harassed physically and tortured mentally by the officials of DRDA, Ganjam. He
has sought intervention of NHRC to dispense justice to him. Acting on his complaint, NHRC
issued notice to the Chief Secretary, Odisha on dated 8.4.2015   seeking response on the Complaint filed by
Sri Rao (Case No.
2210/18/5/2015).
It deserves to be mentioned
here that Sri Rao has also written a letter in April 2014 to the Secretary,
Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of India complaining about denial of
sitting fee/ remuneration to him and non-supply of administrative support staff
to function independently. The MORD
wrote letter twice i.e, dated 7.5.14 and 19.6.14 (D.O. No. L- 11033/10/2010-MGNREGA-VII) to
the Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj, Govt. of Odisha seeking action taken Report  stating 
that “Non-payment of sitting fees  to an Ombudsman is a serious matter and may severely impact 
the Grievance Redressal 
Mechanism under MGNREGs”. But
astonishingly, the State Govt. did not respond the letter nor did provide any
action Taken Report. 
Abysmally failed to get
justice, Sri Rao, Ombudsman approached NHRC seeking Justice. The NHRC is yet to get ATR from the State
Govt. and continue to fix so many dates for hearing and disposal of the cases.  Now,  on capacity  as
Advisor to NHRC, I have sent a letter dated 12.11.15 to NHRC  seeking immediate disposal of the  said 
case and provide justice to Sri Rao who is fighting for justice  since his 
joining  as Ombudsman  from Nov. 13. It shows that how  the District Administration of Ganjam is
creating all sorts of problem and harassing him a lot and pressuring him tol
leave the post. 
What is Ombudsman?
Ombudsman is an Institution formed  under section 27  of MGNREGA 
consisting of one or  up to  three persons 
functions  as an independent  grievance 
redressal body  at district
level  to hear the complaints relating to
implementation of NREG Act and schemes made under the Act, direct the
appropriate authority for redressal, disciplinary and punitive action against
erring officials  involved in
corruption  ad irregularities in NREGS
work and dispense justice to NREGS worker. The Tenure of Ombudsman is  two years and may be extendable upto  one year by the selection Committee headed by
Chief Secretary keeping in view the performance of the Ombudsman. The sitting
fee   of Ombudsman is  fixed as Rs. 1000.00  per day. 
The Process of appointment of
Ombudsman started in Feb 2010  after  the order of the Central Govt dated 7.9.2009.
Following the guideline issued by the Central Govt.,   the State Govt.   ensured appointment of Ombudsman  in almost all districts  in 2010 -11.
Present
situation of Ombudsman in the Districts
On 9.2.15, RTI Application
was submitted to the PIO, Department of Panchayat Raj, Govt. of Odisha seeking
information about details of status of Ombudsman in Odisha.  RTI Application was forwarded to all the
districts to provide the information. In the meanwhile, only 10 districts have
provided the information.  These
districts are Baragarh, Bolangir, Rayagada, Dhenkanal, Kondhamal, Malkangiri,
Kalahandi,  Jajpur, Khorda,  Puri.
Details of Response
of the PIOs of DRDAs of the different districts  is  as
follows-
1.   The
post of Ombudsman is lying vacant in all the districts since 2013. 
2. The
Collector, Baragarh has sent a letter to the Dept. of Panchayat Raj
recommending 3 names since August, 2014. But no step has been taken by the
Govt. to appoint Ombudsman. 
3.  On
30.6.14, the District Collector of Bolangir had recommended three names to the State
Govt. for appointment in the
post of Ombudsman. But no appointment
has been made so far.
4. On
15.7.14, District Collector, Rayagada had recommended two names for appointment of Ombudsman to the Govt. But no
appointment has been made in the district. 
5.  On
16.8.13, the Collector of Dhenkanal district had sent the name of three persons
recommending for appointment in the post of Ombudsman. But the post of the
Ombudsman is lying vacant in the district. 
6.  No
appointment has been made in the post of Ombudsman, Kondhamal.
7.  The post of Ombudsman In Malkangiri  is still vacant  since 
29.9.2013. 
8.  Since
2014, there is no appointment in the post of Ombudsman in Kalahandi district.
9.  The
post of Ombudsman in Jajpur district and Puri district is lying vacant since
2013. 
10.On 28.6.14, the Project Director, DRDA, Khorda
has sent only one name Bhabagrahi Mohapatra to the State Govt. for appointment in the post of Ombudsman. But till
yet no appointment has been made.
11.There is no Ombudsman in Puri district. 
Critical Comments 
A. The system of Ombudsman is defunct across the
state. The Grievances with regard to implementation of NREGA is neither
addressed nor  are the NREGA workers  provided their wage payments  within stipulated time period.
B. In
the absence of effective grievance redressal mechanism, the huge corruption,
irregularities, denial of wages to the workers are noticed throughout the
state. 
C. Wherever,
Ombudsman has been appointed, they are not provided accommodation, office,
supporting staff by the administration. 
They are also seen being denied their remuneration. The plight of   Ombudsman of Ganjam as mentioned above   is the classic example.
D. This
is the conspiracy of the BJD Govt. 
to  destroy all forms of  independent 
grievance redressal mechanism  in
the state  and to let  the corruption  go on. 
E. The
system of Ombudsman needs  to be
restored  at any cost bestowing all the
powers  to this Institutions  to function 
independently  to provide
justice  to  the MGREGA Workers in the State.     
Pradip Pradhan, State Convener
Odisha Soochana
Adhikar Abhijan
M-9937843482
Date-13.11.15
 
This is really astonishing state of affairs almost in all the states of India. department is not digesting the post and department is not releasing the compensation fees of the Ombudsman for months. there is no set procedure to release the salary payments. Govt. of India should take immediate cognizance of this matter and a meeting of all the ombudsman should be called in the MORD to redress the problems being faced by the Ombudsman or post be abolished.Compensation fee is very meagre and that is also not paid in time or not at all. DRDA people says it will be paid only for the day when any case is to be heard not otherwise.Per day compensation should at least be 3000/ and own vehilce be allowed at the rate of RS. 20/ per km for inspections. Staff should be appointed similtainously with the appointment of OMBUDSMAN or all staff of Social Audit be placed / attached with Ombudsman. DRDA or BDOs never/hardly reply the inquiries entrusted to them.
ReplyDelete