Saturday, March 21, 2026

Memorandum to Governor, Odisha demanding dismissal of Odisha Information Commission

                                Odisha Soochana Adhikar Abhijan

                            Plot No.-100, Madhusudan Nagar, Bhubaneswar

                                                   Email- odishasoochanaadhikar@gmail.com

  ---------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                                                                                               

To

The Hon’ble Governor, Odisha

Raj Bhawan, Bhubaneswar

 

Sub- Memorandum seeking dismissal of State Chief Information Commissioner and other Information Commissioners Sri Pabitra Mandal, Smt. Kalpana Pattnaik and Sri Jagannath Rath from the office of Odisha Information Commission for their anti-citizen, illegal, reckless and mindless orders passed by the way of disposing off the Complaint and Second Appeal cases and misbehavior shown by them to the Common Citizens  

 

Sir

We the members of Odisha Soochana Adhikar Abhijan ( a State-level platform of Civil Society Organisations and RTI Activists spearheading campaign for effective implementation of Right to Information Act in Odisha) present this memorandum before your august office in course of our public protest Dharana organized  against mal-functioning of Odisha Information Commission at Lower PMG, Bhubaneswar from 16th to 18th March, 2026 seeking your judicious action in the greater interest of transparency in our state administration and ensuring anti-corruption regime in Odisha.   This memorandum is submitted seeking intervention of His excellency as Constitutional head of the state to conduct a thorough inquiry by way of constituting an inquiry referring to High Court under section 17 of the Right to Information Act into allegation of inefficiency, impropriety of Odisha Information Commission and mindless, reckless  and illegal orders passed by them  without application of mind  and denying justice to the aggrieved citizens  due  to lack of  their  expertise and experience and knowledge about RTI Act.

 

1.    As per section 15(5) of the Right to Information Act, the State Chief Information Commissioner and the State Information Commissioners appointed shall be persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service, management, journalism, mass media or administration and governance. It is believed that in view of this provision, the Selection Committee headed by the Chief Minister selected and recommended name of Sri Manoj Parida as State Chief Information Commissioner and other three Sri Pabitra Mandal, Smt. Kalpana Pattnaik and Sri Pranabindu Acharya as State Information Commissioners   following which His Excellency appointed   them in April, 2025.

 

2.    Within six months of their functioning in terms of hearing and disposal of Second Appeal and Complaint cases and writing orders, their inefficiency, incapability and infirmity of mind is quite visible. Lack of  their knowledge, expertise, experience  and judicial acumen is reflected during hearing of the cases and writing of each order passed in SA and Complaint cases which are uploaded in the Commission’s website.  The orders passed by them lack analysis and interpretation of law, suffers from huge grammatical errors, anomalies and incongruities. We attach herewith the copy of the orders of the cases for the kind perusal of His Excellency to understand the naked inefficiency of the SCIC and Information commissioners. We the RTI Activists and common citizens feel very ashamed having gone through these useless orders which are supposed to be historic orders and placed in website of the Commission for reference for future generation, as it is done by all judicial bodies and quasi-judicial bodies across the country.

 

3.    The State Chief Information Commissioners and State Information Commissioners are so inefficient that they could not   call dictation of the proceedings of the case and could not write orders. The substandard and ill-paid staff are engaged to write the proceedings and order of the Commission. These orders are not only confusing but meaningless and devastating and lacks any clarity.

 

4.    The dogmatism prevailing in their mind is that as if they are most knowledgeable and know everything and they are superior creature in God’s creation. In the month of May, 2025, just few days of their joining, they dismissed 850 Complaint cases without hearing and without giving opportunity of hearing to the Complainants which is the serious violation of Natural Justice and fundamental right of the citizens. As per Odisha Information Commission (Appeal Procedure) Rules, 2006 {Rule-6(4)}, “the   Commission shall not reject the complaint, unless a reasonable opportunity of being heard is given to the complainant.   Sri Manoj Parida, SCIC masterminded this unethical and unconstitutional practice and influenced other Information commissioners ( the Information commissioners appointed by  V.K.Pandian during previous BJD Govt.) to follow it. At the stroke of the pen and without understanding the cases, all these information Commissioners dismissed these cases leaving the poor-complainant-citizens in hopeless world who have cast their vote to BJP to come to power. 

 

5.    The story of  their illegalities and mindless work does not end here. In the month of June, 2025, Sri Manoj Parida issued illegal and arbitrary notice seeking opinion of the complainant / appellant whether they want hearing of the cases or not. The notice issued by the Commission is as follows.

 “The full Commission in the meeting dated 13.6.25 reviewed the pending cases in the Commission. It was noted that there are nearly 6000 cases, pertaining to year 2021 and 2022 which are waiting for hearing. It was noted that during hearing many of the appellants are neither appearing nor seeking adjournment. X xx x x x x. The Commission has decided to dispose of all these old pending cases and second appeal/complaint as closed unless the appellant/ complainant specifically wishes to continue the matter. The appellant is requested to inform the Commission on or before 15th August, 2025 if he wishes to continue the matter. Such intimation can be sent to the Commission by ordinary post or e-mail.”  As per provision of section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act and Odisha Information Commission (Appeal Procedure) Rules,2006, on receipt of the Complaint and Second Appeal, the Commission will register the cases, hear it and pass appropriate order in order to give justice to the citizens. There is no such provision seeking opinion of the complainant whether they want hearing of the cases. However, after receiving the notice, RTI Application was filed in the office of the Information Commission seeking copy of the decision taken on 13.6.25. The PIO, office of the Commission responded that “no such document is available and this decision is completely informal”.  Again, RTI Application was filed on 30.8.25 seeking information about total no. of complainants and Appellants responded /expressed their willingness for hearing and total no. of cases rejected. Astonishingly, the PIO did not supply any information. The office of the Information Commission is far from transparency and maintains utmost secrecy in its functioning.  This is kind of horrible situation of the Commission and the ignominious Manoj Parida has not only   destroyed the credibility of the Institution and made the functioning of the Commission farce.

 

6.    Without contributing anything for effective implementation of RTI Act, Sri Manoj Parida, SCIC is found busy in making false and misleading press release to the media   glorifying the Commission. In the month of December, 2025, the office of the Commission gave a press release declaring that the Commission has taken outstanding decision imposing ban on a poor RTI User who had filed several complaints and Appeals in the Commission due to denial of the information. But  the Hon’ble High Court quashed the order of the Commission terming it as illegal and an attack on fundamental right of the Citizen (WPC No. 29216 of 2025 disposed 15.1.2026).

7.    In the event of mal-functioning of Odisha Information Commission and reckless orders passed by the Commission, there is widespread discontentment among the citizens who are denied the information by the PIOs even after orders being passed by the Commission. The orders are passed on same date of hearing giving direction to the PIO to provide the information and without waiting the compliance report from the PIO and fixing another date for compliance. When the order of the Commission is not complied and the information is not provided by the PIO, the aggrieved-complainant/Appellant approached the Commission what to do in event of non-compliance of order of the Commission. The concerned Information Commissioners expressed their helplessness and said nothing could be done as the case is closed.  It has become common practice of each Information Commissioners and the people are seen moving around the office of the Commission to get a piece of information, as the Commission closed the case without ensuring information.

 

8.    The inefficiency and incapacity of Sri Manoj Parida, SCIC is very visible as he just fixes only 10 cases for hearing in each day and   completes the hearing within 30 minutes and enjoys the office chamber and leaves office at 3 pm. He never calls dictation of the case and also does not know how to write the order / decision of the case. He left this important work to the Law officer and just puts signature without verifying what is written by the Law Officer.   This is the deplorable functioning of head of the Commission, forget   the performance of other Information Commissioners who are determined to follow his footstep devastating sanctity of our cherished bellowed Institution. 

 

9.    Sri Jagannath Rath, appointed by  V.K.Pandian regime during previous Govt. is the most useless person who lacks minimum standard to be Information Commissioner. He  is  a cancer patient, physically and mentally unfit and does not have ability  to hear the case and pass orders without application of mind. Our experience shows that nobody has got justice from him rather humiliated by him.  He never imposes penalty on erring PIOs and rather threatens and misbehaves the common people. The most despicable character in the history of the Commission is Jagannath Rath  who needs to be removed by His Excellency just  to protect the credibility of the Institution.

 

10. Last but not least, we appraise His excellency that this BJP Govt. has come to power on slogan of Odia Asmita ( Pride of Odisha). Our Hon’ble Chief Minister has directed all  the offices to make all official correspondence in Odia language. The common people hailed from rural and tribal areas are demanding before the Information Commission that    the orders passed by the Commission in their cases should be provided in Odia language. As the SCIC and other Information commissioners are sons and daughter of the soil and very poor in English writing, they can easily write  their orders in Odia and pronounce their orders in Odia language in the open court. But Alas; they   suffer from colonial hegemony and write in English which are in illegible, indecipherable and does not carry any meaning. We urge His excellency to direct the Information Commission to make their functioning, orders, correspondence in Odia language in the spirit of odia Asmita.

 

We request the Hon’ble Governor, Odisha to conduct an inquiry into the allegations raised in this memorandum and take appropriate action against the Chief Information Commissioner and other Information Commissioners   in order to protect the most progressive law before being vandalised by the disgruntled Information Commission.  We look forward for detailed discussion, if His excellency desires.

Yours sincerely

Members of Odisha Soochana Adhikar Abhijan

Date-18.3.26

 










Complaint against Odisha Information Commission before SCIC

 

BEFORE HONOURABLE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSION, ODISHA

 

Submission of rejoinder against the reply filed by PIO ,Ex-PIO, in CC No. 1761 and observation in decisions of CC 1768,1760,1764,2281,2443,2444,2437, 2283,2507 of year 2023 and monopoly of SIC(COURT-lll)

 

Appellant: Sri Ranjan Kumar Kar Respondent: 1.Ex PIO,Derabish PS

2.ExPIO,SP Kendrapara 3.ExPIO,Sadar PS, Kendrapara 4.ExPIO,Balasore Sadar PS

 

1. Preliminary Submissions:

 

 

Sir,

I Ranjan Kumar Kar , Complainant in the above cases, most respectfully submit this

counter reply/rejoinder to the reply filed by the OPP. The said reply filed by the Ex- PIO,Derabish PS Inspector Kishore Kumar Tarai and his Advocate Mr. S K Nanda along with PIO Derabish PS Ambika Prasad Das against case number 1761/23 on dated 19.03.2026 is factually false and misleading in nature.

 

He is a repeated liar, perennial defaulter and habitual offender. The reply submitted by the Ex PIO is legally misconceived, and demonstrative of abuse of authority.

 

He is always disobeying the orders of honourable commission and never appeared before commission or responding to the RTI applications/orders of honourable commission in connection to the above cases.

 

Hence the said reply after penal notices is devoid of merit. Also, this is violation of prescribed rules of RTI act 2005 by the Ex PIO and PIO.

 

The Ex PIO, Derabish Inspector K K Tarai is directed on dt 19.03.2026 by the commission to submit the affidavit on behalf of his claim that he has not received this particular Form A dated 21/07/2023 till date and the complainant is directed to submit the evidence of despatch of the particular Form A in connection to this CC 1761/23 before next hearing.


Secondly on 17/03/2026 final decision already dictacted in open court by honourable SIC Mr PRANABINDU ACHARYA in case number 2281/23,2443/23,2444/23,2437/23. A penalty of Rs 20000/- for each case is imposed on Ex PIO Insp Tarai for repeated violation of RTI act and harassment to the Complainant since yr 2023.

 

However on dated 19.03.2026 (1 PM) during hearing of CC 1761/23 in the open court SIC Mr P ACHARYA informed that the orders dictated against CC 2281/23,2443/23,2444/23, 2437/23 on dated 17.03.2026 has been rejected and a fresh date for re-hearing is scheduled. This is nothing but repeated harassment to the petitioner with a malafide intention.

 

The changement in decision by honourable SIC after 2 days of final dictation is very unfortunate. A court is changing it's decision after 2 days of its final dictation indicates that this SIC is working under pressure which is harmful for democracy, judiciary, constitution and rights of victims.

 

In CC number 2507/23 neither the PIO or Ex PIO of Balasore Sadar PS responded to Form-A nor appeared before court as per directions of honourable SIC till date ,still the SIC (COURT-lll) disposed the case without any sufficient reason.This criminal minded Inspector Jayanta Behera manhandled to a senior citizen and Air veteran under influence of power and demanded bribe to release the victim.

 

Thirdly on 20/01/2026 there was 09 CC scheduled for hearing, out of these 09 cases CC 1768/23,1760/23 and 1764/23,2283/23 had been disposed without a single appearance of Ex- PIO or any written reply of the PIO/Ex PIO .

 

In all the above cases both the present PIO DSP Sasmita Sahoo and Inspector Ambika Prasad Das not supplied any written reports and Ex PIO was never present before commission irrespective of repeated written instructions.

 

However I have submitted my written rejoinder on dated 21.01.2026 against their false and fabricated verbal statements delivered witth malafide intention on dated 20.01.2026 in honourable SIC(open court number lll).

 

All the 04 cases are disposed intentionally with only one hearing on dated 20/01/2026. These cases are closed without proper hearing and the dictation are not spelled in the open


court intentionally to protect the currupt police personnel those harassed family members of a soldier under influence of bribe and unethical gain.

 

This is violation of RTI act 2005 by Court number lll .

Earlier I had made written complaints about the irrelevant and monopoly activities of dalals/brockers inside court room number III on dated 20/01/2026 and 03/02/2006 ,which is pending inaction with the authorities of SIC . Still there are some dalals/brockers associated with SIC.They are staying nearby SIC buildings and making hurdles to the victimised person in getting justice and protecting the law violators under influence of bribe.These people are particularly appearing for respondents/PIOs those are repeated offenders and misleading the honourable court,harassing the appellants with malafide intention.

 

This indicates that SIC court number lll is more serious about protecting the currupted police personnel/respondents rather the rights of victimised person .These currupt police personnel are repeatedly violating the orders and RTI act 2005 however SIC(COURT-lll) is protecting them intentionally .The entire Information Commission is gradually loosing the faith of RTI Activists/commonman which is not only unfortunate but also shameful.

 

These police personnel getting protection from SIC had tried to murder the family of a military veteran, violated the fundamental and constitutional rights of a military veteran,harassed my wife ,my old aged parents, minor children, repeatedly filed multiple false criminal cases with severe charges of rape/ murder/ SC & ST atrocities act etc. and now trying to supress the truth by violating RTI act 2005. However the victimised family of a soldier is repeatedly getting harassed and moving post to pillar continuously in search of justice.

 

This is for your information and necessary action please. Encls : (          )

 

Thanks & Regards

Place : Bhubaneswar

Date : 20.03.2026                                                                               Ranjan Kumar Kar

ESM & Activist Mob:7008534890

Email:ranjankar47@gmail.com